US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina Other Statutes Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 3,173
Riehl et al v. EnergyUnited et al
as 5:2024cv00027
Plaintiff:
Joseph Riehl and Amie Riehl
Defendant:
EnergyUnited, Thomas Golden, Alec Natt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
TB v. Nationstar Mortgages, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00082
Plaintiff:
TB
Defendant:
Nationstar Mortgages, LLC doing business as Mr. Cooper, Mr. Cooper Group, Inc. and American International Insurance Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Injunction
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00076
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Robert Semian and Other Clients of MRHFM v. Aldrich Pump LLC, et al.
as 3:2024cv00044
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Bankruptcy Appeal from Judgment/Order
Gutierrez Solorzano v. Mayorkas et al
as 3:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
Jesus Manuel Gutierrez Solorzano
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur M. Jaddou, Daniel M. Renaud and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00066
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Nesbitt v. Mayorkas
as 3:2024cv00063
Plaintiff:
Joseph A. Nesbitt, II
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00055
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.