US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia Contract Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 4,627
SECO USA, Inc. v. Onclave Networks, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00140
Counter Defendant:
SECO USA, Inc.
Counter Claimant:
Onclave Networks, Inc. and Option3 Ventures, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
IPCO LLC v. Precision Weather Solutions Inc.,
as 1:2024cv00123
Plaintiff:
IPCo LLC
Defendant:
Precision Weather Solutions Inc.,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Murrer v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
as 3:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
Thomas J. Murrer
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
McDonald v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
as 1:2024cv00110
Plaintiff:
William T. McDonald
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and Primelending, A Plains Capital Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Alam v. Mercedes Benz USA, LLC
as 1:2024cv00103
Plaintiff:
Mohammed S Alam
Defendant:
Mercedes Benz USA,LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Roadrunner Services, LLC v. Carmax Business Services, LLC
as 3:2024cv00043
Plaintiff:
Roadrunner Services, LLC
Defendant:
Carmax Business Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
McNelley v. General Motors LLC
as 3:2024cv00041
Plaintiff:
Eric William McNelley
Defendant:
General Motors LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Dennison v. Kia America, Inc
as 2:2024cv00043
Plaintiff:
Christina Marie Dennison
Defendant:
Kia America, Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Sunset Pool Management, Inc. v. Truist Bank
as 1:2024cv00082
Plaintiff:
Sunset Pool Management, Inc.
Defendant:
Truist Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Empower AI, Inc. v. Dillahay
as 1:2024cv00083
Plaintiff:
Empower AI, Inc.
Defendant:
Paul A. Dillahay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
