US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 4,159
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 1:2023cv01785
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 1:2023cv01781
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 v. Doe
as 1:2023cv01782
Plaintiff:
Strike 3
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 1:2023cv01794
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 1:2023cv01789
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Vericool World LLC v. Temperpack Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01761
Plaintiff:
Vericool World LLC
Defendant:
Temperpack Technologies, Inc. and TemperPack Virginia, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2023cv01762
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Delta Defense, LLC v. deltadefensecareers.com
as 1:2023cv01752
Plaintiff:
Delta Defense, LLC
Defendant:
deltadefensecareers.com
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark (Anticybersquatting consumer protection)
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2023cv01728
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Secure NFC PTY. LTD. v. Mastercard Incorporated
as 1:2023cv01717
Plaintiff:
Secure NFC PTY. LTD.
Defendant:
Mastercard Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
