Virginia Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,433
Burandt v. Vidal
as 1:2024cv00751
Plaintiff:
Corliss O. Burandt
Defendant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
SoundClear Technologies LLC v. Amazon.Com, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00728
Plaintiff:
SoundClear Technologies LLC
Defendant:
Amazon.Com, Inc., Amazon.Com LLC and Amazon Web Services Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 281 Patent Infringement
SoundClear Technologies LLC v. Google LLC
as 1:2024cv00729
Plaintiff:
SoundClear Technologies LLC
Defendant:
Google LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 281 Patent Infringement
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2024cv00672
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2024cv00630
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
CzechPoint, Inc. v. Southern Tactical, LLC
as 3:2024cv00282
Plaintiff:
CzechPoint, Inc.
Defendant:
Southern Tactical, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
CzechPoint, Inc. v. Southern Tactical, LLC
as 1:2024cv00634
Plaintiff:
CzechPoint, Inc.
Defendant:
Southern Tactical, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2024cv00574
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2024cv00528
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2024cv00459
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
