Virginia Social Security Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 119
Peters v. Commissioner of Social Security, Michael Astrue
as 5:2011cv00133
Defendant:
Commissioner Of Social Security, Michael Astrue
Plaintiff:
Susan K. Peters
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Sage v. Astrue
as 1:2011cv00077
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Plaintiff:
Belinda Ida Sage
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Lamie v. Astrue
as 1:2011cv00076
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
James Oscar Lamie, Jr.
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Keffer v. Astrue
as 7:2011cv00478
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Laure Ann Keffer
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Bowers v. Astrue
as 1:2011cv00072
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Plaintiff:
Brian David Bowers
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Dalton v. Astrue
as 7:2011cv00436
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
James F. Dalton
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Winder v. Astrue
as 1:2011cv00956
Plaintiff:
Yvette M. Winder
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Peak v. Astrue
as 7:2011cv00414
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Plaintiff:
Frances Tate Peak
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Corvin v. Astrue
as 7:2011cv00391
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Plaintiff:
Robert Estle Corvin
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Felts v. Astrue
as 1:2011cv00054
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Nathan M. Felts
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
