US District Court for the Southern District of Texas Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 76,737
Velasquez v. Doe
as 4:2024cv01569
Plaintiff:
Kim Velasquez
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01555
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01575
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Matamoros v. Doe
as 4:2024cv01579
Plaintiff:
Marlon Matamoros
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
DeYoung v. Conner et al
as 4:2024cv01580
Plaintiff:
Executor Anna DeYoung
Defendant:
James Christopher Conner, Conner and Associates LLC d/b/a Franchise Marketing Systems, Greg Rondinelli and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Flores Property Holdings LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00099
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Flores Property Holdings LLC and Jaime A. Flores
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01548
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Davis Jr. v. Jose Chapa Law Firm
as 4:2024cv01561
Plaintiff:
Peter Davis Jr.
Defendant:
Jose Chapa Law Firm
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01549
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01479
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
