US District Court for the Southern District of Texas Labor Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 8,867
Sabrsula v. EOG Resources, Inc.
as 4:2024cv01520
Plaintiff:
Chad Sabrsula
Defendant:
EOG Resources, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Flores v. RV Solution, LLC et al
as 4:2024cv01519
Plaintiff:
Juan Jose Flores
Defendant:
RV Solution, LLC, Alejandro Viera Gamez and Joel Alberto Rezendiz Salas
Lopez v. Strategy Professional Services, LLC et al
as 4:2024cv01496
Plaintiff:
Edwin Lopez
Defendant:
Strategy Professional Services, LLC and Mohammed Bennani
Cochran v. Worley Field Services Inc
as 4:2024cv01475
Plaintiff:
Chase Cochran
Defendant:
Worley Field Services Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Bibbs v. Allstream Technical Consultants, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv01442
Plaintiff:
Aaron Bibbs
Defendant:
Allstream Technical Consultants, Inc., Steve Eppolito and Clayton Stokes
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaskett v. Pemex Incorporated et al
as 4:2024cv01433
Plaintiff:
Ronald Augustine Plaskett
Defendant:
Pemex Incorporated and Shell LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Shabazz-Martin v. UNUM Life Insurance Company of America
as 4:2024cv01428
Plaintiff:
Patina Shabazz-Martin
Defendant:
UNUM Life Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Cox v. Metro Video Services LLC
as 4:2024cv01392
Plaintiff:
William Thomas Cox
Defendant:
Metro Video Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Diffa v. Daikin Comfort Technologies, Manufacturing, LP
as 4:2024cv01377
Plaintiff:
Weniboebi Diffa
Defendant:
DAIKIN COMFORT TECHNOLOGIES, MANUFACTURING L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Ali v. Rameesah Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv01355
Plaintiff:
Mir Ajmal Ali
Defendant:
Rameesah Enterprises, Inc., Sadoor Khan and Mabroor Khan
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
