US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 1,126
Carpenter v. Robey
as 1:2022cv00095
Petitioner:
Jeffery Carpenter
Respondent:
Warden Amy Robey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Patton v. Ferguson
as 3:2022cv00400
Petitioner:
Samuel Patton
Respondent:
Jessie Ferguson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gabbard v. Green
as 4:2022cv00091
Petitioner:
Grover Clifton Gabbard
Respondent:
Warden David Green
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Stepp v. Mazza
as 3:2022cv00368
Petitioner:
Chad Aaron Stepp
Respondent:
Warden Kevin Mazza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Larrabee v. Gilley
as 1:2022cv00081
Petitioner:
Jonathan Wayne Larrabee
Respondent:
Warden J. Gilley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Flores v. Unknown Defendant
as 3:2022cv00367
Plaintiff:
Ramon F. Flores
Defendant:
Unknown Defendant and Lamine N'Diaye
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Flintroy v. United States of America
as 3:2022cv00347
Petitioner:
Kenneth Dion Flintroy, Jr.
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Sims v. Commonwealth of Kentucky
as 5:2022cv00077
Petitioner:
David A. Sims
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Taylor v. Jordan
as 3:2022cv00320
Petitioner:
Robert Markham Taylor
Respondent:
Scott Jordan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Morris v. Green
as 5:2022cv00070
Petitioner:
Bradley Tyson Morris
Respondent:
David Green
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
