US District Court for the Western District of Michigan Other Statutes Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 80
Michigan Chamber of Commerce et al v. Land
as 1:2010cv00664
Plaintiff:
Michigan Chamber of Commerce , Michigan Chamber Political Action Committee III and Sterling Consulting Corporation
Defendant:
Terri Lynn Land
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McNeilly v. Land
as 1:2010cv00612
Plaintiff:
Greg McNeilly
Defendant:
Terri Lynn Land
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Zibbell et al v. Michigan Department of Human Services et al
as 2:2010cv00023
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Zibbell and Cheryl Zibbell
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Human Services and Michigan Department of Community Health
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Constantino et al v. Washington et al
as 1:2009cv00506
Plaintiff:
Stanley Constantino, Gail Jones, Richard Konkel and others
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, Department of State Police and Peter Munoz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Moffit #271355 v. Missaukee, County of
as 2:2009cv00107
Plaintiff:
Kelvin David Moffit #271355
Defendant:
Missaukee, County of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Brock v. Cox
as 1:2009cv00310
Plaintiff:
Ronald Brock
Defendant:
Mike Cox
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Parsad v. Granholm et al
as 1:2008cv00962
Plaintiff:
Al Parsad
Defendant:
Jennifer Granholm, Mike Cox and Keith W. Cooley
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Muhammad v. Kent County Friend of the Court
as 1:2008cv00889
Plaintiff:
Masih Muhammad
Defendant:
Kent County Friend of the Court
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Bogaert v. Land
as 1:2008cv00687
Plaintiff:
Rose Bogaert
Defendant:
Terri Lynn Land
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Muhammad v. United States Government
as 1:2008cv00494
Plaintiff:
Masih H. Muhammad
Defendant:
United States Government
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
