US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio Labor Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 2,137
Blue v. Inoac Exterior Systems, LLC
as 3:2024cv00836
Plaintiff:
Tyson Blue
Defendant:
Inoac Exterior Systems, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Woodrow v. TANGO FIBER, INC
as 3:2024cv00839
Plaintiff:
Aaron Woodrow
Defendant:
TANGO FIBER, INC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Dorn v. Progressive Quality Care, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00797
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Dorn
Defendant:
Progressive Quality Care, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Arble v. Dominion Energy Services, Inc.
as 5:2024cv00747
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Arble
Defendant:
Dominion Energy Services, Inc. doing business as Dominion Energy Ohio
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Lewis v. Cleveland Medical Devices, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00725
Plaintiff:
Robin Lewis
Defendant:
Cleveland Medical Devices, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Arroyo v. Progressive Quality Care, Inc. et al.
as 1:2024cv00693
Plaintiff:
Amanda Arroyo
Defendant:
Progressive Quality Care, Inc. and Progressive North Ridgeville, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Filing Error
as 1:2024cv00689
Plaintiff:
Robin Lewis
Defendant:
Cleveland Medical Devices, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Brown v. Dr. Kates Growing Smiles Children's Dentistry, LLC et al.
as 1:2024cv00658
Plaintiff:
Valissa Brown
Defendant:
Dr. Kates Growing Smiles Children's Dentistry, LLC, Ohio VIP Dental Assisting School and Dale A. Kates
Ferguson v. BlendedTraditions Inc. et al.
as 5:2024cv00647
Plaintiff:
William Ferguson
Defendant:
BlendedTraditions Inc. and Tasha N. Harris
Thayer v. SFR3 Renovation, LLC
as 5:2024cv00624
Plaintiff:
Joseph Thayer
Defendant:
SFR3 Renovation, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
