Ohio Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 4,980
Innovative Health, LLC v. Vein360, LLC
as 1:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
Innovative Health, LLC
Defendant:
Vein360, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Smith v. Coulter Ventures, LLC
as 2:2024cv00499
Plaintiff:
Brent Smith
Defendant:
Coulter Ventures, LLC doing business as Rogue Fitness
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Gubbala v. Abercrombie & Fitch Trading Co.
as 2:2024cv00444
Plaintiff:
Srinivasa Rao Gubbala
Defendant:
Abercrombie & Fitch Trading Co.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Golden Rule Fasteners, Inc. v. The Neverleak Company, LP
as 1:2024pl35002
Counter Defendant:
Golden Rule Fasteners, Inc.
Defendant:
Neverleak Company, LP
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
In Re: Pipe Flashing Patent Litigation
as 1:2024md03093
Plaintiff:
Golden Rule Fasteners, Inc.
Defendant:
Oatey Co., R.P. Lumber Co., Inc. and Neverleak Company, LP
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
Golden Rule Fasteners, Inc. v. R.P. Lumber Co., Inc.
as 1:2024pl35001
Plaintiff:
Golden Rule Fasteners, Inc.
Defendant:
R.P. Lumber Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 183 Patent Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 1:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 1:2024cv00037
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 1:2024cv00038
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 2:2024cv00345
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
