US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 1,562
Lee v. Phillips
as 3:2023cv01243
Petitioner:
Darius Darrell Lee
Respondent:
Shawn Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sims v. State of Tennessee
as 3:2023cv01237
Petitioner:
Ronnie D. Sims, Jr.
Respondent:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Bennett v. Fitz
as 3:2023cv01227
Petitioner:
Cortez Bennett
Respondent:
Johnny Fitz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bonilla v. Watwood
as 3:2023cv01211
Petitioner:
Jose Gonzalez Bonilla
Respondent:
Brandon Watwood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Brun
as 3:2023cv01181
Petitioner:
Rodney Jones
Respondent:
Christopher Brun
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Morris v. Fitz
as 3:2023cv01165
Petitioner:
Adarion Morris
Respondent:
Johnny Fitz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Larsen v. Wellness Path Medical et al
as 3:2023cv01155
Petitioner:
Jennifer Widener Larsen
Respondent:
Wellness Path Medical, Sheriff Steve Reams and Sheriff f/n/u Heyer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Day v. State of Tennessee
as 3:2023cv01150
Petitioner:
Terry Day
Respondent:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Keel v. Leeds
as 3:2023cv01147
Petitioner:
William Rolandus Keel
Respondent:
Chance Leeds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Price v. Watwood
as 3:2023cv01140
Petitioner:
Dustin Shawn Price
Respondent:
Warden Brandon Watwood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
