Seventh Circuit Social Security Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 24,472
Brin v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv02960
Plaintiff:
Reid C. Brin
Defendant:
Commissioner Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Britny Casten v. Martin O'Malley
as 24-1583
Plaintiff:
BRITNY N. CASTEN
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, Commissioner of Social Security
Rudd v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00295
Plaintiff:
Evert Rudd, II
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
O'kane, Jason v. O'Malley, Martin
as 3:2024cv00234
Plaintiff:
Jason C. O'kane
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Mecum, Michael v. O'Malley, Martin
as 3:2024cv00229
Plaintiff:
Michael Mecum
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Moore v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv02890
Plaintiff:
Yulonda Moore
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Karrick v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv01072
Plaintiff:
James Clay Karrick
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSAOGC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Mcfadden v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv00121
Plaintiff:
Ebony Nicole Mcfadden
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Not Yet Classified:
General Counsel SSA (Court use only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Wilcox v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv02075
Plaintiff:
Leanna S Wilcox
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security - Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Campbell v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00144
Plaintiff:
Karen S. Campbell
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
