Seventh Circuit Social Security Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 9,531
SHILTS v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00368
Plaintiff:
LORI ANNE SHILTS
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA Martin J O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Whitaker v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00555
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Whitaker
Defendant:
Martin J O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
English v. Social Security
as 1:2024cv00178
Plaintiff:
Michael L. English
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Griffith v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv01206
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Griffith
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSAOGC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Neuman v O'Malley
as 2:2024cv02092
Plaintiff:
ANDREW NEUMAN
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Wagner v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03353
Plaintiff:
Timothy S. Wagner
Defendant:
Commissioner Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Bowker v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00163
Plaintiff:
Jenifer L. Bowker
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Not Yet Classified:
General Counsel SSA (Court use only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
GEORGE v. O'MALLEY
as 2:2024cv00154
Plaintiff:
CEANN RAE GEORGE
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Rybicki v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv03214
Plaintiff:
John Rybicki
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jahinsha v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03192
Plaintiff:
Ms. Nahrain Jahinsha
Defendant:
Commissioner Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 425 Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
