Seventh Circuit Social Security Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 25,554
Garcia v. King
as 1:2025cv01479
Plaintiff:
Doradelia Garcia
Defendant:
Commissioner Michelle A. King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Howard v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2025cv00144
Plaintiff:
Micky William Howard
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Corbett v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2025cv00067
Plaintiff:
Melissa F Corbett
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Knight v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2025cv00058
Plaintiff:
Stuart E Knight
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
Poling v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2025cv00059
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Ann Poling
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
La Jeunesse v. King
as 1:2025cv01399
Plaintiff:
David La Jeunesse
Defendant:
Michelle King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Florey v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2025cv03034
Plaintiff:
Carmen Lynette Florey
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security - Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
HACKNEY v. KING
as 1:2025cv00274
Plaintiff:
SHERMAINE D. HACKNEY
Defendant:
MICHELLE A. KING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Broker v. King
as 1:2025cv00203
Plaintiff:
Ann Marie Broker
Defendant:
Michelle A King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Kokesch v. King
as 1:2025cv00201
Plaintiff:
Christopher Kokesch
Defendant:
Michelle King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.