Seventh Circuit Social Security Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 25,725
DEATON v. DUDEK
as 4:2025cv00051
Plaintiff:
TIFFANY SHANDAIL DEATON
Defendant:
LELAND C. DUDEK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Thompson, II v. Dudek
as 1:2025cv02994
Plaintiff:
Anthony A. Thompson, II
Defendant:
Leland Dudek
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Austin v. Dudek
as 1:2025cv02991
Plaintiff:
Stephine J. Austin
Defendant:
Leland Dudek
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Rachel v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2025cv00375
Plaintiff:
Roper Rachel
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSAOGC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Bond, III v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2025cv00376
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Bond, III
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSAOGC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Pickens v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2025cv02083
Plaintiff:
Dontrell D Pickens
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security - Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
WOOLBRIGHT v. DUDEK, ACTING COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
as 1:2025cv00528
Plaintiff:
TRACY R. WOOLBRIGHT
Defendant:
LELAND DUDEK, ACTING COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
N.M.C. v. DUDEK
as 3:2025cv00057
Plaintiff:
N.M.C.
Defendant:
LELAND C. DUDEK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Morris v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2025cv02909
Plaintiff:
Melissa Morris
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Freschini v. Dudek
as 1:2025cv02893
Plaintiff:
Enza Freschini
Defendant:
Leland Dudek
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
