Seventh Circuit Social Security Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 25,859
GIPSON v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2025cv00715
Plaintiff:
TERRY WAYNE GIPSON, II
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
CARTWRIGHT v. DUDECK
as 3:2025cv00085
Plaintiff:
TIFFANY CARTWRIGHT
Defendant:
LELAND DUDECK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Bafia v. Dudek
as 1:2025cv03981
Plaintiff:
Stanislaw Bafia
Defendant:
Leland Dudek
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Titel v. Dudek
as 1:2025cv03982
Plaintiff:
April Titel
Defendant:
Leland Dudek
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Anderson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2025cv02109
Plaintiff:
Jessica J. Anderson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security - Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Wallace v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2025cv00172
Plaintiff:
Tiffany L. Wallace
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Unknown:
General Counsel SSA (Court use only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Osmankic v. Dudek
as 1:2025cv03927
Plaintiff:
Aida Osmankic
Defendant:
Leland Dudek
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
McLain v. Dudek
as 3:2025cv50167
Plaintiff:
Timothy McLain
Defendant:
Leland Dudek
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Keating v. Dudek
as 1:2025cv03945
Plaintiff:
Melissa G. Keating
Defendant:
Leland Dudek
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Baumgart v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2025cv00549
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Baumgart
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSAOGC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
