US District Court for the Central District of Illinois Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 4,737
Carr v. Arbanal et al
as 2:2024cv02081
Plaintiff:
Otis Carr
Defendant:
. Arbanal, . Wilham, Douglas County Illinois and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. Campbell et al
as 3:2024cv03049
Plaintiff:
Samuel Woods
Defendant:
Steven Campbell, Tim Adensaya and Stephany Howard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Drago v. Chime Financial Technology Company
as 3:2024cv03046
Plaintiff:
James Drago
Defendant:
Chime Financial Technology Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harper v. Nurse et al
as 1:2024cv01066
Plaintiff:
Bednaco Harper
Defendant:
Mindi Nurse, Katrina Joiner, Wexford Medical Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2024cv01069
Plaintiff:
Keith Clark
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Olivares Venegas v. Demoss et al
as 1:2024cv01062
Plaintiff:
Jonathan B Olivares Venegas
Defendant:
Dakota Demoss, Ronald Fryman, John Gaffney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Splant v. Cisco
as 2:2024cv02025
Defendant:
Christopher Cisco and Ford County Circuit Clerk
Plaintiff:
Kelly Splant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Caddell v. Dobkins
as 2:2024cv02022
Plaintiff:
Mark Caddell, Jr
Defendant:
Marvin Dobkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davenport v. Raisin Canes Restaurant et al
as 2:2024cv02003
Plaintiff:
Faron Davenport
Defendant:
Raisin Canes Restaurant and Mgr of Raisin Canes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davenport v. University of Illinois Police Dept
as 2:2024cv02004
Plaintiff:
Faron Davenport
Defendant:
University of Illinois Police Dept
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
