US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 9,804
Yamini v. Richards et al
as 3:2024cv00659
Plaintiff:
Dorian Yamini
Defendant:
B Richards, Robin Bortok, Dr. David and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Loftus v. USA
as 3:2024cv00653
Petitioner:
William B. Loftus, III
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
York v. USA
as 3:2024cv00630
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Jay York
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
McNeal v. Tucker et al
as 3:2024cv00619
Plaintiff:
Anthony McNeal
Defendant:
Nathan Tucker, Warden Daniel Monti and Daniel Monti
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Niewiedzial v. Adams
as 3:2024cv00620
Plaintiff:
Michael Niewiedzial
Defendant:
Trisha Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ike v. Sadler
as 3:2024cv00569
Plaintiff:
Larry Ike, Jr
Defendant:
Bradley T Sadler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Rayford et al
as 3:2024cv00572
Plaintiff:
Delvin Brown and Delvon Brown
Defendant:
C/O Rayford, Lt. Dallas, C/O Hughes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy v. Wills et al
as 3:2024cv00582
Plaintiff:
Steven Murphy
Defendant:
Anthony Wills, Wexford Health Source, Connie Dolce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2024cv00584
Plaintiff:
Eddie Robinson
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, Wexford Health Sources Inc., Dennis Larson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blackwell v. Watson
as 3:2024cv00581
Petitioner:
Ryan D Blackwell
Respondent:
Richard Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
