Illinois Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 7,216
Rosa v. Lammer
as 3:2024cv50045
Petitioner:
Eric Rosa
Respondent:
Warden Brian Lammer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Adams v. Monti
as 3:2024cv00182
Petitioner:
Jerome Adams
Respondent:
Daniel Monti
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
James v. Greene
as 2:2024cv02018
Petitioner:
Kevin James
Respondent:
Brittney Greene
Not Yet Classified:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cruz v. F.C.I. Greenville et al
as 3:2024cv00162
Petitioner:
Jessie Nichole Cruz
Respondent:
F.C.I. Greenville and T. Lillard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Borowski v. Sproul
as 3:2024cv00163
Petitioner:
Matthew Paul Borowski
Respondent:
D. Sproul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Williams v. Monti
as 3:2024cv00165
Petitioner:
Edward Williams
Respondent:
Daniel Monti
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Monti
as 3:2024cv00164
Petitioner:
Edward Williams
Respondent:
Daniel Monti
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sroga v. Circuit Court of Cook County
as 1:2024cv00616
Petitioner:
Kevin Sroga
Respondent:
CCDOC, Dart, People of the State of Illinois and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Al Momani v. Monti et al
as 2:2024cv02017
Petitioner:
Baha'Eddin Al Momani
Respondent:
Daniel Monti
Defendant:
Service List
Not Yet Classified:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carter v. Wills
as 3:2024cv00136
Petitioner:
Calvin L Carter, III
Respondent:
Anthony Wills
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
