US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri Social Security Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 4,724
McCabe v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
Holly L. McCabe
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Brower v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00498
Plaintiff:
Sarah Brower
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Enos v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00499
Plaintiff:
Tracy Enos
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Laramie v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00500
Plaintiff:
Savannah Laramie
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Maslo v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00504
Plaintiff:
Antonia Maslo
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Pitts v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00496
Plaintiff:
Travis John Pitts
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Gartner v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
Carrie Gartner
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Boyd v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00445
Plaintiff:
William Boyd
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Dudley v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00446
Plaintiff:
Patrick Dudley
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Walker v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00058
Plaintiff:
Shanreckia Lanell Walker
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
