US District Court for the Southern District of California
Cases 61 - 70 of 55,878
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00690
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Arias v. Bank
as 3:2024cv00701
Plaintiff:
Joni Gay Arias
Defendant:
Merrick Bank
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Gordon v. Momentum Solar, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00693
Plaintiff:
Paula Gordon
Defendant:
Momentum Solar, LLC and Coadvantage Resources 50, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 fm Fed. Question: Family and Medical Leave Act
Sandquist v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00698
Plaintiff:
Erica Sandquist
Defendant:
Martin OMalley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 wc Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Loera v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00691
Plaintiff:
Joshua Jerome Loera
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 id Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Ewing v. DME Capital, LLC
as 3:2024cv00692
Plaintiff:
Anton A. Ewing
Defendant:
DME Capital, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227 FCC-Unsolicited Telephone Sales
Charman v. California Check Cashing Stores, LLC. et al
as 3:2024cv00695
Plaintiff:
Thane Charman
Defendant:
California Check Cashing Stores, LLC. An California Limited Liability Company doing business as Speedy Cash and Does 1 through 10
Charman v. Snap Inc.
as 3:2024cv00694
Plaintiff:
Thane Charman
Defendant:
Snap Inc. a Deleware Incorperation doing business as Snapchat
Del Rosario, MD et al v. McCrary
as 3:2024cv00686
Plaintiff:
Gelen Del Rosario, MD, Arij Faksh, DO and Bridge Prenatal, LLC
Defendant:
Jack McCrary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 ij Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
Carlock v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 3:2024cv00684
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Carlock
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Analisa Gutierrez Nogales and Does 1 to 100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2672 mv Federal Tort Claims Act - Motor Vehicle
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
