California Contract Cases

Miller Act Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 11 - 20 of 882
Ferguson Enterprises, LLC v. Harper Construction Co. Inc., et al
as 2:2023at01213
Plaintiff: Ferguson Enterprises, LLC
Defendant: Harper Construction Company, Inc. and Hartford Fire Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
Viking Construction Co., Inc. v. Nomlaki Technologies, LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv02684
Plaintiff: Viking Construction Company, Inc.
Defendant: Nomlaki Technologies, LLC and Great American Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1352 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
C.R. Powless & Co. LLC v. Lexington National Ins. Co.
as 2:2023cv02680
Plaintiff: C.R. Powless & Co. LLC
Defendant: Lexington National Insurance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Type: Contract Miller Act
CAPITOL BUILDERS HARDWARE, INC. v. RAL INVESTMENT CORPORATION
as 5:2023cv05462
Plaintiff: Capitol Builders Hardware, Inc. and United States for the use of Capitol Builders Hardware, Inc.
Defendant: RAL INVESTMENT CORPORATION, THE HANOVER INSURANCE COMPANY and RAL INVESTMENT CORPORATION doing business as Silverstrand Construction, a California corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America v. Globalnet and Associates, LLC, et al
as 5:2023cv02140
Plaintiff: S.R. Bray, LLC, a California limited liability company dba Power Plus! and United States of America for the Use and Benefit of S.R. BRAY, LLC, a California limited liability company doing business as Power Plus!
Petitioner: Defendant The Gray Insurance Company, a Louisiana corporation
Defendant: Globalnet & Associates, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, DLC Electric, Inc., a California corporation, Globalnet and Associates, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States, For the Use of A GLASCO, INC.. v. Diversified Maintenance System, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv01866
Plaintiff: United States, For the Use of A GLASCO, INC..
Defendant: Diversified Maintenance System, Inc., Employers Mutual Casualty Company and Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 bc Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Type: Contract Miller Act
Ferguson Enterprises, LLC et al v. Harper Construction Company, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv01855
Plaintiff: Ferguson Enterprises, LLC and United States
Defendant: Harper Construction Company, Inc. and Hartford Fire Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1352 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States for the Use of Universal Electronic Alarms Inc. et al v. Endurance Assurance Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2023cv02047
Plaintiff: United States for the Use of Universal Electronic Alarms, Inc., Universal Electronic Alarms, Inc., United States for the Use of Universal Electronic Alarms Inc. and others
Defendant: Endurance Assurance Corporation, Crystal Fue Veavea doing business as Miracle One Builders, Miracle One Builders, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1352 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
Southern Spear Ironworks LLC v. Parsons Government Services Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv08347
Plaintiff: Southern Spear Ironworks, LLC and Southern Spear Ironworks LLC
Defendant: Parsons Government Services Inc., Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland and Federal Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1352 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
Southern Spear Ironworks, LLC v. Parsons Government Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2023at00852
Plaintiff: Southern Spear Ironworks, LLC
Defendant: Parsons Government Services, Inc., Parsons Government Services International Inc., Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Type: Contract Miller Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?