California Social Security Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 12,741
Dacones v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00727
Plaintiff:
Gidget Verna Dacones
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7405 IRS: Action for recovery of refunds erroneously made
Bowman v. O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv00858
Plaintiff:
Mike Bowman
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Lepe v. O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv00840
Plaintiff:
Alfonso Lepe
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Noe Valdez v. Martin OMalley
as 2:2024cv03339
Plaintiff:
Noe Valdez
Defendant:
Martin OMalley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Kies v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00710
Plaintiff:
Bethany Kies
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 wc Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
(SS) Dutra v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv01145
Plaintiff:
Eileen L. Dutra
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Mathew P. W. v. Martin O Malley
as 5:2024cv00826
Plaintiff:
Mathew P. Wilson
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Sirot v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv02275
Plaintiff:
Pierre Marcel Sirot
Defendant:
Comm'r of Soc. Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Alexander v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv02276
Plaintiff:
Kristine Alexander
Defendant:
Comm'r of Soc. Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Sandquist v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00698
Plaintiff:
Erica Sandquist
Defendant:
Martin OMalley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 wc Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
