California Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 5,982
Elvis Edgardo Molina v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv02296
Petitioner:
Elvis Edgardo Molina
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Wolfenbarger v. USA
as 5:2024cv01592
Petitioner:
John Wolfenbarger
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Gonzalez Lopez v. USA
as 3:2024cv00505
Petitioner:
Marco Antonio Gonzalez Lopez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Jesus Martinez Delgado v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv02124
Petitioner:
Jesus Martinez Delgado
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Aleman v. USA
as 3:2024cv01624
Petitioner:
Rogelio Antonio Belloso Aleman
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Carbajal v. USA
as 1:2024cv00299
Petitioner:
Jose Jesus Carbajal
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Chelsea Shannon McIntyre v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv01984
Petitioner:
Chelsea Shannon McIntyre
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Andres Urena v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv02147
Petitioner:
Andres Urena
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Aparicio v. USA
as 1:2024cv00271
Petitioner:
Valdemar Zamora Aparicio
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Daniels v. USA
as 3:2024cv00384
Petitioner:
Akil Saeed Daniels
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
