US District Court for the District of Hawaii Civil Rights Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 35
Emrit v. Montevista Mental Hospital
as 1:2018cv00443
Defendant:
Montevista Mental Hospital
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Emrit v. Secretary of State of Hawaii et al
as 1:2017cv00504
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Secretary of State of Hawaii and Democratic Party of Hawaii
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
De La Fuente v. Nago et al
as 1:2016cv00398
Plaintiff:
Roque De La Fuente
Defendant:
Scott T. Nago and Hawaii, State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Oyadomari v. Wilson
as 1:2016cv00141
Defendant:
Charles Chip Wilson
Plaintiff:
William K. Oyadomari
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fuller v. Nai Aupuni Directors et al
as 1:2015cv00470
Plaintiff:
Harris M. Fuller, Jr.
Defendant:
Nai Aupuni Directors, James K. Asam, Pauline N. Namu'o and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Amsterdam v. Na'i Aupuni FD
as 1:2015cv00447
Plaintiff:
C. Kaui Jochanan Amsterdam
Defendant:
Na'i Aupuni FD , Kuhio Asam , Pauline Namuo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Akina v. State of Hawaii
as 1:2015cv00322
Plaintiff:
Keli'i Akina , Kealii Makekau , Joseph Kent and others
Defendant:
State of Hawaii, The , David Y. Ige , Robert K. Lindsey, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamamoto et al v. Abercrombie et al
as 1:2014cv00491
Plaintiff:
Eugene Hamamoto and John P. Roco
Defendant:
Neil Abercrombie , Democratic Party of Hawaii , Brian Schatz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Democratic Party of Hawaii v. Nago
as 1:2013cv00301
Plaintiff:
Democratic Party of Hawaii
Defendant:
Scott T. Nago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Justice Party (The) et al v. Nago
as 1:2012cv00403
Plaintiff:
Justice Party (The) and Kristine Kubat
Defendant:
Scott T. Nago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
