Hawaii Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 1,055
Hurst v. Derr et al
as 1:2022cv00171
Plaintiff:
Eric Hurst
Defendant:
Estela Derr, Kris Robl and Nurse Dayton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Watanabe v. Derr et al
as 1:2022cv00168
Plaintiff:
Kekai Watanabe
Defendant:
Estela Derr, Mr. K. Robl, Nurse Nielsen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
(PC) Agustin v. United States of America
as 1:2022cv00167
Plaintiff:
Justin E. Agustin
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Ah Puck, Jr. v. Jones et al
as 1:2022cv00165
Plaintiff:
Hardy K. Ah Puck, Jr.
Defendant:
Tracy Jones, Maui Intake Service Center, Jennifer and others
Interested Party:
Laurie Nadamoto and Shelley Harrington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
White v. Derr et al
as 1:2022cv00159
Plaintiff:
David White
Defendant:
Estella Derr and Dr. Kwon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Sullivan v. Derr et al
as 1:2022cv00155
Plaintiff:
Leihinahina Sullivan
Defendant:
Estella Derr, Federal Detention Center - Honolulu and Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LaPuente v. Derr et al
as 1:2022cv00150
Plaintiff:
Jourdan J. LaPuente
Defendant:
Estela Derr and Kris Robl
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Kaneakua v. Derr et al
as 1:2022cv00149
Plaintiff:
Elijah Maluhia Kaneakua
Defendant:
Estela Derr and Kris Robl
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Smith v. Derr, et al
as 1:2022cv00134
Plaintiff:
Jacob L. L. Smith
Defendant:
Estela Derr and Shawn Tabar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Tabaoda v. Derr et al
as 1:2022cv00125
Plaintiff:
Timothy Tabaoda
Defendant:
Estela Derr and Shawn Tabor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
