Idaho Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 2,205
Paz v. State of Idaho, et al.
as 1:2023cv00571
Plaintiff:
Federico Paz
Defendant:
State of Idaho, Adrian Paz, Tom Evans and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Custer County Jail et al
as 4:2023cv00568
Plaintiff:
Billy Joe Thomas
Defendant:
Custer County Jail and Jordan Kunkel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dillard v. United States et al
as 1:2023cv00557
Plaintiff:
Jonathan F Dillard
Defendant:
United States, US Marshals, Deborah Gresham and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Dillard v. United States of America, et al.
as 1:2023cv00572
Plaintiff:
Jonathan F. Dillard
Defendant:
United States of America, US Marshals, Kassandra McGrady and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Morrison v. Oppedyk, et al.
as 1:2023cv00564
Plaintiff:
Kalob Wyth Morrison
Defendant:
George Oppedyk, Dave Pinther and George Warrell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Byerly v. State of Idaho et al
as 1:2023cv00563
Plaintiff:
Nathan Byerly
Defendant:
State of Idaho, OC Josh Tewalt, Brett Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mary v. Buird
as 1:2023cv00555
Plaintiff:
Sharon Joy Mary
Defendant:
Nick Buird
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dillard v. Calm Water Counseling et al
as 1:2023cv00550
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Dillard
Defendant:
Calm Water Counseling and M. Peters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cherry v. IDOC, et al.
as 1:2023cv00546
Plaintiff:
Stephen A. Cherry
Defendant:
IDOC, Sandy Perally, Robert Wheeler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dunlap v. Andrus et al
as 1:2023cv00549
Plaintiff:
Timothy Allan Dunlap
Defendant:
Cecil D Andrus and Raul Labradour
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
