US District Court for the District of Oregon Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 529
Cloud 9 Comics LLC v. Cloud 9 Comics and More LLC et al
as 3:2021cv00173
Defendant:
Paul Gubany and Cloud 9 Comics and More LLC
Plaintiff:
Cloud 9 Comics LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
Darex, LLC v. Beach Audio, Inc.
as 1:2020cv02236
Plaintiff:
Darex, LLC
Defendant:
Beach Audio, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
Darex, LLC v. 67 Hardware, Inc.
as 1:2020cv02239
Defendant:
67 Hardware, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Darex, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
Glacier45, LLC v. National Distillers Products Company, LLC et al
as 2:2020cv02234
Plaintiff:
Glacier45, LLC
Defendant:
National Distillers Products Company, LLC and Anne W. Salisbury
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Darex, LLC v. Fat Boy Tools, LLC et al
as 1:2020cv02238
Defendant:
Fat Boy Tools2, LLC and Fat Boy Tools, LLC
Plaintiff:
Darex, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
Holy Donut, Inc. v. Moore et al
as 1:2020cv02200
Defendant:
Michelle Natina Moore an individual d/b/a Holey Donut, The Doughnut Hole Limited Liability Company, Christopher Aaron Newton an individual d/b/a Holey Donut and others
Plaintiff:
The Holey Donut, Inc., Holey Donut, Inc. and Holy Donut, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
Boyajian Products, LLC v. Enby LLC
as 3:2020cv01991
Plaintiff:
Boyajian Products, LLC
Defendant:
Enby LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Darex, LLC v. J and B Tool Sales, Inc.
as 1:2020cv01731
Defendant:
J and B Tool Sales, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Darex, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
QH Holdings (Oregon), Inc. v. Quantum Dynamics, Inc.
as 3:2020cv01424
Plaintiff:
QH Holdings (Oregon), Inc.
Defendant:
Quantum Dynamics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Eat Me Lures Inc. v. Cafepress LLC et al
as 6:2020cv01406
Defendant:
Phillip Millner, Fred E. Durham, Robert D. Barton and others
Plaintiff:
Eat Me Lures Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.