US District Court for the Eastern District of Washington Social Security Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 4,866
Robledo v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03007
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Robledo, Jr
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Devenny v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03006
Plaintiff:
Dawn Devenny
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Stevens v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03005
Plaintiff:
Michael Stevens
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Silva v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03003
Plaintiff:
Maria Marisol Silva
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Seely v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
Dejalenda Seely
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Gronau v. O'Malley
as 1:2023cv03210
Plaintiff:
Tashia Lynn Gronau
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Hunt v. O'Malley
as 1:2023cv03211
Plaintiff:
Tonise Renae Hunt
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Espino v. O'Malley
as 1:2023cv03209
Plaintiff:
LaTrisa Dennell Espino
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Harrison v. O'Malley
as 4:2023cv05178
Plaintiff:
James Harrison
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Griffin v. O'Malley
as 1:2023cv03208
Plaintiff:
Feleighsha Donnalla Griffin
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
