U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit Federal Tax Suits Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 103
William Pintner v. US
as 14-2393
Plaintiff:
CHARLES B. ERWIN
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Third Party Defendant - Appellant:
WILLIAM G. PINTNER
Third Party Defendant:
STEPHEN C. COGGIN, JAMES BARRY LIGHT and HARTSELL B. LIGHT, JR.
US v. James MacAlpine
as 14-2058
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JAMES E. MACALPINE
Timothy Hudak v. Internal Revenue Service
as 14-1465
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIMOTHY J. HUDAK and KATHERINE L. HUDAK
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Third Party Defendant:
DWIGHT C. MULES
US v. Charles Payton
as 14-1143
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CHARLES JAMES PAYTON and RUBY PAYTON
Alan Zinstein v. US
as 13-2456
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALAN ZINSTEIN and JANE SILK
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Nina Cannon v. US
as 13-2438
Plaintiff - Appellee:
NINA CANNON, Trustee of the Irrevocable Cannon Family Trust U/A Dated 5/25/2005
Defendant - Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Richard Buskell v. US
as 13-2095
Plaintiff - Appellee:
RICHARD P. BUSKELL
Defendant - Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Babcock Center, Inc. v. US
as 13-2056
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BABCOCK CENTER, INCORPORATED
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, acting by and through its agency, The Internal Revenue Service
Kevin Smith v. U.S. Government
as 13-1633
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN MICHAEL SMITH, for and on behalf of K.M.J. International, Inc. and KEVIN MICHAEL SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
U.S. GOVERNMENT, U.S. TREASURY DEPARTMENT, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE and others
Clarence Johnson v. IRS
as 13-1518
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLARENCE D. JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
IRS, N. C. UNEMPLOYMENT, VIRGINIA EMPLOYMENT COMMISSION and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
