U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit Civil Rights Cases

Cases filed

Cases 1 - 10 of 4,693
Amira Salem, et al v. MDOC, et al
as 15-1598
Plaintiff - Appellee: AMIRA SALEM, KESHUNA ABCUMBY
Defendant - Appellant: MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DANIEL H. HEYNS, Director at MDOC, THOMAS G. FINCO, Deputy Director MDOC and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-3550
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Richard Rocheleau v. Elder Living Construction, et al
as 15-1588
Plaintiff - Appellant: RICHARD ROCHELEAU
Defendant - Appellee: ELDER LIVING CONSTRUCTION, ESS, INC., FIRST ADVANTAGE CORP.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-5540
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Aristides Jurado, et al v. Amy Stone, et al
as 15-3543
Plaintiff - Appellant: ARISTIDES JURADO, N.G. MINOR CHILD
Defendant - Appellee: AMY C. STONE, SCOTT J. DREXEL, OHIO OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL - SUPREME COURT OF OHIO and others
Defendant: FRANKLIN COUNTY COMMON PLEAS COURT, DIVISION OF DOMESTIC DIVISION, JUVENILE BRANCH, THOMAS MCCASH, BLYTHE M. BETHEL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-1585
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-5534
Plaintiff - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-5535
Plaintiff - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Melindia Jackson v. USPG
as 15-1578
Plaintiff - Appellant: MELINDIA GAIL JACKSON
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES POSTMASTER GENERAL
Marcus Ramos v. Tesfa Chevers, et al
as 15-3529
Plaintiff - Appellant: MARCUS RAMOS
Defendant - Appellee: TESFA CHEVERS, BRETT KODGER, BRITTANY JONES and others
1 2 3 4 5 Next

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.