U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit Contract Cases

Stockholders Suits Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 41 - 50 of 94
Nikolai Grigoriev, et al v. Don Charney, et al
as 12-57055
Plaintiff - Appellant: NIKOLAI GRIGORIEV and ANDREW SMUKLER
Defendant - Appellee: DON CHARNEY, ADRIAN KOWALEWSKI, MARK SAMSON and others
CAMOFI Master LDC, et al v. Jerrold Pressman, et al
as 12-56755
Plaintiff - Appellee: CAMOFI MASTER LDC and CAMHZN MASTER LDC, derivatively on behalf of U S Aerospace Inc
Defendant: JERROLD PRESSMAN, LUCE FORWARD HAMILTON AND SCRIPPS LLP and U.S. AEROSPACE, INC., Nominal Defendant
Defendant - Appellant: MICHAEL GOLDBERG, KENNETH J. KOOCK, JAMES HENDERSON and others
David Defrees, et al v. John Kirkland, et al
as 12-56756
Plaintiff - Appellee: DAVID L. DEFREES, in the right of and for the benefit of U S Aerospace Inc., SIMON GERSHON, in the right of and for the benefit of U S Aerospace Inc. and FREDERICK RICH, in the right of and for the benefit of U S Aerospace Inc
Defendant - Appellant: JOHN C. KIRKLAND, KENNETH J. KOOCK, MICHAEL L. GOLDBERG and others
Defendant: LUCE, FORWARD, HAMILTON AND SCRIPPS LLP, JERROLD S. PRESSMAN and U.S. AEROSPACE, INC., Nominal Defendant
CAMOFI Master LDC, et al v. Jerrold Pressman, et al
as 12-56385
Plaintiff - Appellee: CAMOFI MASTER LDC and CAMHZN MASTER LDC, derivatively on behalf of U S Aerospace Inc
Defendant: JERROLD PRESSMAN, LUCE FORWARD HAMILTON AND SCRIPPS LLP and U.S. AEROSPACE, INC., Nominal Defendant
Defendant - Appellant: MICHAEL GOLDBERG, KENNETH J. KOOCK, JAMES HENDERSON and others
David Defrees, et al v. John Kirkland, et al
as 12-56377
Plaintiff - Appellee: DAVID L. DEFREES, in the right of and for the benefit of U S Aerospace Inc., SIMON GERSHON, in the right of and for the benefit of U S Aerospace Inc. and FREDERICK RICH, in the right of and for the benefit of U S Aerospace Inc
Defendant - Appellant: JOHN C. KIRKLAND, KENNETH J. KOOCK, MICHAEL L. GOLDBERG and others
Defendant: LUCE, FORWARD, HAMILTON AND SCRIPPS LLP, JERROLD S. PRESSMAN and U.S. AEROSPACE, INC., Nominal Defendant
Wimbledon Financing Master, et al v. David Molner, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-56328
Plaintiff - Appellee: WIMBLEDON FINANCING MASTER FUND, LTD, a Cayman Islands company and STILLWATER MARKET NEUTRAL FUND III SPC, a Cayman Islands company
Defendant - Appellant: DAVID MOLNER, an individual, SCREEN CAPITAL INTERNATIONAL CORP., Erroneously Sued As Screen Capital International Inc, a Delaware Corporation and ARAMID CAPITAL PARTNERS, LLP, a United Kingdom limited liability partnership
Defendant: ARAMID ENTERTAINMENT FUND LIMITED
Saginaw Police & Fire Pension v. Marc Andreessen, et al
as 12-16473
Plaintiff - Appellant: SAGINAW POLICE & FIRE PENSION FUND, derivatively on behalf of Hewlett-Packard Company
Defendant - Appellee: MARC L. ANDREESSEN, LAWRENCE T. BABBINIO, SARI M. BALDAUF and others
Police Retirement System of St v. Intuitive Surgical, Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-16430
Plaintiff - Appellant: POLICE RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF ST. LOUIS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee: INTUITIVE SURGICAL, INC., BENJAMIN GONG, ALEKS CUKIC and others
James Johnson, et al v. Steven Myers, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-16428
Plaintiff - Appellee: JAMES R. JOHNSON, TERRENCE SIMS, HEATHER SIMS and others
Plaintiff: ROPERS MAJESKI KOHN & BENTLEY
Defendant - Appellant: STEVEN L. MYERS, DBA Myers Engineering International, Inc. and MYERS ENGINEERING INTERATIONAL INC
Dave Lucia v. Michael Mendes, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-16299
: In re: DIAMOND FOODS, INC. DERIVATIVE LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellant: DAVE LUCIA, derivately on behalf of Diamond Foods, Inc.
Defendant - Appellee: MICHAEL J. MENDES, STEVEN M. NEIL, LAURENCE M. BAER and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?