U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit Contract Cases

Stockholders Suits Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 51 - 60 of 94
Sekuk Global Enterprises, et al v. National Automatic Sprinkler, et al
as 12-16217
In Re: In re: APOLLO GROUP, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee: SEKUK GLOBAL ENTERPRISES, JACK B. MCBRIDE, CHRISTOPHER CARMONA and others
Objector - Appellant: NATIONAL AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER INDUSTRY PENSION FUND and SPRINKLER INDUSTRY SUPPLEMENTAL PENSION FUND
Defendant - Appellee: APOLLO GROUP INCORPORATED, TODD S. NELSON and KENDA B. GONZALES
Movant - Appellee: NEW ENGLAND-PONTIAC FUNDS, CITY OF PONTIAC POLICEMEN'S AND FIREMEN'S RETIREMENT SYSTEM, NEW ENGLAND HEALTH CARE EMPLOYEES PENSION FUND and others
James Johnson, et al v. Steven Myers, et al
as 12-15923
Plaintiff - Appellant: JAMES R. JOHNSON
Plaintiff: TERRENCE SIMS, HEATHER SIMS, JOSLYN JOHNSON-BENNING and others
Defendant - Appellee: STEVEN L. MYERS, DBA Myers Engineering International, Inc. and MYERS ENGINEERING INTERATIONAL INC
Willa Rosenbloom, et al v. David Pyott, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-55516
Plaintiff - Appellant: WILLA ROSENBLOOM, derivatively on behalf of Allergan, Inc., DANIEL HIMMEL, POMPANO BEACH POLICE & FIREFIGHTERS RETIREMENT SYSTEM and others
Defendant - Appellee: DAVID E. I. PYOTT, HERBERT W. BOYER, AKA Herbert W. Boyer, M.D., LOUIS J. LAVIGNE, Jr. and others
Yenidunya Investments, Ltd. v. Magnum Seeds, Inc., et al
as 12-15413
Plaintiff - Appellant: YENIDUNYA INVESTMENTS, LTD., a Cyprus, EU corporation
Defendant - Appellee: MAGNUM SEEDS, INC., a California corporation and GENICA RESEARCH CORPORATION, a Nevada corporation
David Defrees, et al v. John Kirkland, et al
as 12-55318
Plaintiff - Appellee: DAVID L. DEFREES, in the right of and for the benefit of U S Aerospace Inc., SIMON GERSHON, in the right of and for the benefit of U S Aerospace Inc. and FREDERICK RICH, in the right of and for the benefit of U S Aerospace Inc.
Defendant: JOHN C. KIRKLAND, MICHAEL C. CABRAL, JERROLD S. PRESSMAN and others
Defendant - Appellant: LUCE, FORWARD, HAMILTON AND SCRIPPS LLP
CAMOFI Master LDC, et al v. Jerrold Pressman, et al
as 12-55320
Plaintiff - Appellee: CAMOFI MASTER LDC and CAMHZN MASTER LDC, derivatively on behalf of U S Aerospace Inc
Defendant: JERROLD PRESSMAN, MICHAEL GOLDBERG, KENNETH J. KOOCK and others
Defendant - Appellant: LUCE FORWARD HAMILTON AND SCRIPPS LLP
David Defrees, et al v. John Kirkland, et al
as 12-55163
Plaintiff - Appellee: DAVID L. DEFREES, in the right of and for the benefit of U S Aerospace Inc. and SIMON GERSHON, in the right of and for the benefit of U S Aerospace Inc.
Defendant: JOHN C. KIRKLAND, LUCE, FORWARD, HAMILTON AND SCRIPPS LLP, MICHAEL C. CABRAL and others
Defendant - Appellant: JERROLD S. PRESSMAN, KENNETH J. KOOCK, MICHAEL L. GOLDBERG and others
CAMOFI Master LDC, et al v. Jerrold Pressman, et al
as 12-55155
Plaintiff - Appellee: CAMOFI MASTER LDC and CAMHZN MASTER LDC, derivatively on behalf of U S Aerospace Inc
Defendant: JERROLD PRESSMAN, MICHAEL GOLDBERG, KENNETH J. KOOCK and others
Defendant - Appellant: JOHN C. KIRKLAND
CAMOFI Master LDC, et al v. Jerrold Pressman, et al
as 12-55160
Plaintiff - Appellee: CAMOFI MASTER LDC and CAMHZN MASTER LDC, derivatively on behalf of U S Aerospace Inc
Defendant - Appellant: JERROLD PRESSMAN, MICHAEL GOLDBERG, KENNETH J. KOOCK and others
Defendant: JOHN C. KIRKLAND, LUCE FORWARD HAMILTON AND SCRIPPS LLP and U.S. AEROSPACE, INC., Nominal Defendant
David Defrees, et al v. John Kirkland, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-55144
Plaintiff - Appellee: DAVID L. DEFREES, in the right of and for the benefit of U S Aerospace Inc. and SIMON GERSHON, in the right of and for the benefit of U S Aerospace Inc.
Defendant - Appellant: JOHN C. KIRKLAND
Defendant: LUCE, FORWARD, HAMILTON AND SCRIPPS LLP, MICHAEL C. CABRAL, JERROLD S. PRESSMAN and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?