U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit Contract Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 2,084
Cloanto Corporation, et al v. Hyperion Entertainment C.V.B.A.
as 23-35315
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CLOANTO CORPORATION, AMIGA, INC, a Delaware corproation, AMINO DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, a Washington corporation and others
Defendant / Appellee:
HYPERION ENTERTAINMENT C.V.B.A.
Metejemei, LLC v. MoneyTree, Inc.
as 23-15662
Plaintiff / Appellant:
METEJEMEI, LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
MONEYTREE, INC.
Workplace Technologies Research, Inc. v. Project Management Institute, Inc.
as 23-55407
Appellant:
WORKPLACE TECHNOLOGIES RESEARCH, INC.
Counter Claimant:
PROJECT MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE, INC.
Eric Bright, et al v. Treehouse Group, LLC, et al
as 23-15652
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ERIC WARREN BRIGHT and DARLENA BRIGHT
Defendant / Appellee:
TREEHOUSE GROUP, LLC and BREIT-BRIGHTHAVEN MHC, LLC
Ignite Spirits, Inc. v. Consulting by AR, LLC, et al
as 23-15638
Plaintiff:
IGNITE SPIRITS, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
CONSULTING BY AR, LLC
Counter Defendant:
IGNITE INTERNATIONAL BRANDS, LTD.
El Al Israel Airlines, Ltd. v. Swissport USA, Inc.
as 23-15636
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EL AL ISRAEL AIRLINES, LTD.
Defendant / Appellee:
SWISSPORT USA, INC.
Ignite Spirits, Inc. v. Consulting by AR, LLC, et al
as 23-15635
Plaintiff / Appellant:
IGNITE SPIRITS, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
CONSULTING BY AR, LLC
Counter Defendant:
IGNITE INTERNATIONAL BRANDS, LTD.
Workplace Technologies Research, Inc. v. Project Management Institute, Inc.
as 23-55394
Plaintiff:
WORKPLACE TECHNOLOGIES RESEARCH, INC.
Counter Claimant:
PROJECT MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE, INC.
Prabhjot Kang v. Western Governors University
as 23-35286
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PRABHJOT KAUR KANG
Defendant / Appellee:
WESTERN GOVERNORS UNIVERSITY
Takeya USA Corporation v. PowerPlay Marketing Group, LLC
as 23-55376
Plaintiff:
TAKEYA USA CORPORATION, a California corporation
Counter Claimant:
POWERPLAY MARKETING GROUP, LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
