U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 61
U.S. Philips Corporation
as 14-56592
Plaintiff - Appellant:
U.S. PHILIPS CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation
Movant - Appellee:
KBC BANK N.V.
U.S. Philips Corporation
as 14-56541
Plaintiff - Appellee:
U.S. PHILIPS CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation
Movant - Appellant:
KBC BANK N.V.
Amphastar Pharmaceuticals Inc v. Aventis Pharma SA, et al
as 14-56382
Plaintiff - Appellee:
AMPHASTAR PHARMACEUTICALS INC
Defendant - Appellant:
AVENTIS PHARMA SA, AVENTIS PHARMACEUTICALS INC and SANOFI-AVENTIS SA
David Everist v. United States Department of Ag, et al
as 14-35661
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID D. EVERIST
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOREST SERVICE, DONNA MICKLEY, SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR and others
U.S. Philips Corporation v. KBC Bank N.V.
as 14-56199
Plaintiff - Appellee:
U.S. PHILIPS CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation
Movant - Appellant:
KBC BANK N.V.
Qiang Wang v. Palo Alto Networks, Inc., et al
as 14-16092
Plaintiff - Appellant:
QIANG WANG
Defendant - Appellee:
PALO ALTO NETWORKS, INC., NIR ZUK and FENGMIN GONG
Agit Global, Inc., et al v. Wham-O Marketing, Inc.
as 14-55746
Plaintiff - Appellee:
AGIT GLOBAL, INC., a Taiwanese corporation and TZONG IN YEH, an individual, AKA John Yeh
Defendant - Appellant:
WHAM-O MARKETING, INC.
Bruce Horton v. USA
as 14-15537
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRUCE HORTON
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Muffin Anderson v. Kimberly-Clark Corporation
as 13-35958
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MUFFIN FAYE ANDERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
KIMBERLY-CLARK CORPORATION
TriPharma, LLC v. First Fruits Business Ministry, et al
as 13-56170
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TRIPHARMA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
Defendant - Appellee:
FIRST FRUITS BUSINESS MINISTRY, LLC, a South Carolina limited liability company, FIRST FRUITS BEVERAGE COMPANY, LLC, a Georgia limited liability company and ROGER J. CATARINO
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
