U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit Other Statutes Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 135
Glenn Bosworth v. USDOJ, et al
as 16-56809
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GLENN BOSWORTH
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, JAMES COMEY, Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation and others
Shaun Rosiere v. USA
as 16-17029
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHAUN ROSIERE
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Civil Beat Law Center for the v. Centers for Disease Control &
as 16-16960
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CIVIL BEAT LAW CENTER FOR THE PUBLIC INTEREST, INC.
Defendant - Appellee:
CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL & PREVENTION
Renewal Services v. USPTO
as 16-56088
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RENEWAL SERVICES
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
A Better Way for BPA v. US DOE Bonneville Power Admin.
as 16-35414
Plaintiff - Appellant:
A BETTER WAY FOR BPA
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY BONNEVILLE POWER ADMINISTRATION
Edward Tuffly v. USDHS
as 16-15342
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD TUFFLY, AKA Bud Tuffly
Defendant - Appellee:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Stephen Yagman v. Michael Pompeo
as 15-55442
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEPHEN YAGMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN OWEN BRENNAN, MICHAEL POMPEO and CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
First Amendment Coalition v. USDOJ
as 15-15117
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FIRST AMENDMENT COALITION
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Amicus Curiae:
REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS
Michael Jones v. OWCP
as 14-16875
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL R. JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAM
Michael Jones v. OWCP
as 14-16599
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL R. JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAM
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
