U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 96,987
United States of America v. Hurbace
as 24-2581
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
PHILLIP D. HURBACE
X Corp. v. Center for Countering Digital Hate, Inc., et al.
as 24-2643
Plaintiff:
X CORP., a Nevada corporation
Defendant:
CENTER FOR COUNTERING DIGITAL HATE, INC., a Washington, D.C. non-profit corporation, CENTER FOR COUNTERING DIGITAL HATE LTD., Center for Countering Digital Hate Ltd. and STICHTING EUROPEAN CLIMATE FOUNDATION
Attia v. Oura Ring, Inc., et al.
as 24-2622
Plaintiff:
PETER ATTIA
Defendant:
OURA RING, INC. and OURA HEALTH, LTD.
Velasquez Velasquez v. Garland
as 24-2608
Petitioner:
RODOLFO VELASQUEZ VELASQUEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Kaur v. Garland
as 24-2614
Petitioner:
HARMEET KAUR
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Ortiz Garabito v. Garland
as 24-2611
Petitioner:
ROSA LINDA ORTIZ GARABITO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Schuman, et al. v. Microchip Technology Incorporated, et al.
as 24-2624
Plaintiff:
PETER SCHUMAN and WILLIAM COPLIN
Defendant:
MICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY INCORPORATED, ATMEL CORPORATION and ATMEL CORPORATION UNITED STATES SEVERANCE GUARANTEE BENEFIT PROGRAM
Faucett v. Move, Inc.
as 24-2631
Plaintiff:
PRIESTLEY FAUCETT, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant:
MOVE, INC., doing business as Realtor.com
Gopher Media LLC, et al. v. Melone, et al.
as 24-2626
Plaintiff:
GOPHER MEDIA LLC, a Nevada Limited Liability Corporation formerly known as Local Clicks doing business as Doctor Multimedia and AJAY THAKORE, an individual
Defendant:
ANDREW MELONE, an individual and AMERICAN PIZZA MANUFACTURING, a California business entity also known as American Pizza Mfg.
Wehner v. Genentech, Inc., et al.
as 24-2630
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW WEHNER
Defendant:
GENENTECH, INC. and UNITED STATES ROCHE DC FIDUCIARY COMMITTEE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
