U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit Other Statutes Cases
Cases 131 - 140 of 422
Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Rod Runyon, et al
as 17-35207
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY
Defendant - Appellee:
ROD RUNYON, Commission Chair of the Wasco County Board of Commissioners, STEVE KRAMER, County Commissioner of the Wasco County Board of County Commissioners, SCOTT HEGE, County Commissioner of the Wasco County Board of County Commissioners and others
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee:
FRIENDS OF THE COLUMBIA GORGE, INC., COLUMBIA RIVERKEEPER and OREGON PHYSICIANS FOR SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY
Movant:
CONFEDERATED TRIBES OF THE UMATILLA INDIAN RESERVATION, THE CONFEDERATED TRIBES OF THE WARM SPRINGS RESERVATION OF OREGON and CONFEDERATED TRIBES AND BANDS OF THE YAKAMA NATION
Michael Hucul v. USHHS, et al
as 17-55192
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL HUCUL, a Father with joint custody of his child or children, on behalf of himself and those like him. And as a Parent with joint custody of their child or children.
Defendant - Appellee:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES, SYLVIA MATHEWS BURWELL, Former United States Secretary of Health and Human Services, STATE OF MICHIGAN and others
Unico Mechanical Corp., et al v. Kamala Harris, et al
as 17-15094
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UNICO MECHANICAL CORP., a California corporation and ALFRED CONHAGEN, INC. OF CALIFORNIA, a California corporation
Defendant / Appellee:
KAMALA D. HARRIS, in her official capacity as Attorney General for the State of California, CHRISTINE BAKER, in her official capacity as the Director of the California Department of Industrial Relations, DIANE RAVNIK, in her official capacity as the Chief of the California Division of Apprenticeship Standards and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
STATE BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION TRADES COUNCIL OF CALIFORNIA, AFL-CIO
Unico Mechanical Corp., et al v. Kamala Harris, et al
as 17-15094
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNICO MECHANICAL CORP., a California corporation and ALFRED CONHAGEN, INC. OF CALIFORNIA, a California corporation
Defendant - Appellee:
KAMALA HARRIS, in her official capacity as Attorney General for the State of California, CHRISTINE BAKER, in her official capacity as the Director of the California Department of Industrial Relations, DIANE RAVNIK, in her official capacity as the Chief of the California Division of Apprenticeship Standards and others
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee:
STATE BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION TRADES COUNCIL OF CALIFORNIA, AFL-CIO
Masoud Khazali v. Elizabeth Berns
as 17-35033
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MASOUD KHAZALI
Defendant - Appellee:
ELIZABETH BERNS
Joseph Shalant v. State Bar of California, et al
as 17-55050
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH LEIB SHALANT
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA, JANE KIM, JOSEPH R. CARLUCCI and others
Thomas More Law Center v. Kamala Harri
as 16-56902
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS MORE LAW CENTER
Defendant - Appellee:
KAMALA HARRIS, in her Official Capacity as Attorney General of the State of California
Marguerite Richard v. Ed Murray, et al
as 16-36059
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARGUERITE RICHARD
Defendant - Appellee:
ED MURRAY, Mayor, CITY OF SEATTLE and FRED PODESTA, Director of Finance and Administration
Thomas More Law Center v. Kamala Harris
as 16-56855
Plaintiff - Appellee:
THOMAS MORE LAW CENTER
Defendant - Appellant:
KAMALA HARRIS, in her Official Capacity as Attorney General of the State of California
P. Chiafalo, et al v. Jay Inslee, et al
as 16-36034
Plaintiff - Appellant:
P. BRET CHIAFALO and LEVI GUERRA
Defendant - Appellee:
JAY INSLEE, in his official capacity as Governor of Washington, BOB FERGUSON, in his official capacity as Attorney General of Washington and KIM WYMAN, in her official capacity as Washington Secretary of State
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee:
WASHINGTON STATE REPUBLICAN PARTY, DONALD J. TRUMP and DONALD J. TRUMP FOR PRESIDENT INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
