US District Court for the District of Massachusetts Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 3,827
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 1:2024cv11089
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 1:2024cv11096
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 1:2024cv11090
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 1:2024cv11093
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 1:2024cv11084
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 1:2024cv11094
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
IOT INNOVATIONS LLC v. SAVANT SYSTEMS, INC.
as 1:2024cv11057
Plaintiff:
IOT INNOVATIONS LLC
Defendant:
SAVANT SYSTEMS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Kiernan Joseph Liebl, Inc. v Indian Farm Estates, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv11019
Plaintiff:
Kiernan Joseph Liebl, Inc. doing business as Royal Oaks Design, Inc.
Defendant:
Indian Farm Estates, LLC and James Martorilli
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Omni Continuum LLC v. NKT Photonics Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv11007
Plaintiff:
Omni Continuum LLC
Defendant:
NKT Photonics Inc. and NKT Photonics A/S
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Moran Foods LLC V. 235 Lazaro Market LLC et al
as 1:2024cv11020
Plaintiff:
MORAN FOODS, LLC d/b/a Save-A-Lot, Ltd.
Defendant:
235 LAZARO MARKET LLC, ANTHONY PENA, KINGS GROCERY LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
