US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Leonard et al v. The Alabama State Board of Pharmacy et al
as 3:2021cv00596
Plaintiff:
Lisa Hill Leonard and Leonard Drugs Inc. An Alabama Corporation doing business as The Drug Store
Defendant:
The Alabama State Board of Pharmacy, Brenda Denson, Chris Phung and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Massey Chrysler Center, Inc. et al v. CDK Global, LLC et al (JOINT ASSIGN)
as 2:2018cv00042
Plaintiff:
Massey Chrysler Center, Inc. and Massey Automotive, Inc.
Defendant:
CDK Global, LLC and The Reynolds and Reynolds Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Foley v. Greene Communications, Inc. et al (MAG2)(CONSENT)
as 3:2014cv00877
Plaintiff:
J. Michael Foley
Defendant:
Greene Communications, Inc. , R.M. Greene & Co., Inc. and Magnolia Greene, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Entec Stations, Inc., et al. v. Murphy Oil USA, Inc.
as 2:2014cv00380
Plaintiff:
Entec Stations, Inc. , Major Oil Company, Inc. , Russell Oil Company, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Murphy Oil USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2801
Builders Flooring Connection, LLC v. Brown Chambless Architects, LLC et al
as 2:2011cv00373
Plaintiff:
Builders Flooring Connection, LLC
Defendant:
Brown Chambless Architects, LLC , Goodwyn, Mills & Cawood, Inc. , 2WR Holmes Wilkins Architects, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Brown v. Heartland Payment Systems, Inc.
as 2:2009cv00086
Plaintiff:
Steve Brown, Steve Brown and Steve Brown
Defendant:
Heartland Payment Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Home Oil Company, Inc. v. Flying J, Inc.
as 1:2007cv00184
Plaintiff:
Home Oil Company, Inc.
Defendant:
Flying J, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2801 Petroleum Marketing Practices Act
CSP Technologies, Inc. et al v. Sud-Chemie AG et al
as 3:2006cv00587
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
