US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama Real Property Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 65
Carmichael v. Saxon Mortgage Services, Inc.
as 2:2011cv01110
Plaintiff:
Harris Mac Carmichael
Defendant:
Saxon Mortgage Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 2605
Mobley et al v. RBC Bank
as 3:2011cv00858
Plaintiff:
Haiwatha Mobley and Maxie Mobley
Defendant:
RBC Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dixon et al v. Citimortgage, Inc.
as 3:2011cv00825
Plaintiff:
Tracey Dixon and Richard Jason Dixon
Defendant:
Citimortgage, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 2605
Morris v. Holder
as 2:2011cv00783
Plaintiff:
Dave Morris
Defendant:
Eric Holder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2410
Trustmark National Bank v. Edwards Properties, LTD. et al
as 2:2011cv00534
Plaintiff:
Trustmark National Bank
Defendant:
Edwards Properties, LTD. and Lanier J. Edwards
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cahaba Forests, LLC v. Hay et al
as 3:2011cv00423
Plaintiff:
Cahaba Forests, LLC
Defendant:
Mary George East Hay, Doris East Ragsdale, Lynda Marie East Rice Woodall and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Wright v. State of Alabama Medicaid et al
as 2:2010cv00154
Plaintiff:
Will A. Wright
Defendant:
State of Alabama Medicaid, Medicare, Baptist Health and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2410 Quiet Title
First Tuskegee Bank v. McCall et al
as 2:2009cv01137
Plaintiff:
First Tuskegee Bank
Defendant:
Martin McCall, Sr., United States of America - Internal Revenue Service, State of Alabama - Department of Revenue and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2410 Quiet Title
Citigroup Global Markets Realty Corp. v. The City of Montgomery
as 2:2009cv00784
Plaintiff:
Citigroup Global Markets Realty Corp.
Defendant:
The City of Montgomery
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Real Property
Massey v. Shell et al
as 2:2009cv00772
Plaintiff:
Minnie Massey
Defendant:
Edna Shell, Eugene Shell, Al Kelley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition to Quiet Title
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
