US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama Labor Cases
Cases 141 - 150 of 6,483
Thomas v. Mercedes-Benz US International Inc
as 7:2022cv01345
Plaintiff:
Chris Thomas
Defendant:
Mercedes-Benz US International Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act (1993)
Waddell v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company
as 2:2022cv01346
Plaintiff:
Larry Waddell
Defendant:
Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Rodgers v. City of Warrior
as 2:2022cv01305
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Rodgers
Defendant:
City of Warrior
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Moss v. Birmingham Jefferson County Transit Authority
as 2:2022cv01298
Plaintiff:
Mark Moss
Defendant:
Birmingham Jefferson County Transit Authority
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Sandlin v. Tower Loan LLC
as 5:2022cv01284
Plaintiff:
Ronald Matthew Sandlin
Defendant:
Tower Loan LLC doing business as Gulfco of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Combs v. Big Bang Enterprises Inc
as 1:2022cv01283
Plaintiff:
Timothy Combs
Defendant:
Big Bang Enterprises Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Tepole v. VL Construction, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv01279
Plaintiff:
Alfonso Tepole
Defendant:
VL Construction, LLC and Valente Lambarria-Medina
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Hunter v. Multimetco Inc
as 1:2022cv01285
Plaintiff:
Elijah Wade Hunter
Defendant:
Multimetco Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act (1993)
Trammell v. Ragland, Town of
as 4:2022cv01250
Plaintiff:
Kevin Trammell
Defendant:
Ragland, Town of
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Owens et al
as 4:2022cv01225
Defendant:
Kristy H Owens and Tammy L Henzel
Interpleader:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
