Arizona Other Statutes Cases
Cases 111 - 120 of 4,421
Application of ICM SPC
as 2:2023mc00023
In Re:
Ex Parte Application of ICM SPC on behalf of Ancile Special Opportunity and Recovery Fund Segregated Portfolio
Petitioner:
ICM SPC
United States of America v. Bradley
as 3:2023mc08001
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Ulysses Bradley
Lumpkin v. Felician Sisters of North America Incorporated
as 2:2023mc00022
In Re:
Matrix Absence Management Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Deanna Lumpkin
Defendant:
Felician Sisters of North America Incorporated
Gerow v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 2:2023cv01059
Plaintiff:
Eric Gerow
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice, Phoenix, City of, Phoenix Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Injunction
Alatorrre v. Moctezuma
as 2:2023cv01049
Petitioner:
Edgar Eugenio Amezquita Alatorrre
Respondent:
Gabriela Moctezuma
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 11601 International Child Abduction Remedies Act
Reflex Media Incorporated v. Endeavor Standard SDN BHD et al
as 2:2023mc00020
Defendant:
Darren Chan, Endeavor Standard SDN BHD a Malaysian company doing business as TheSugarBook.com, LGM 01 & LGM 01A Emerald Plaza and others
Plaintiff:
Reflex Media Incorporated
Garnishee:
CCBill LLC
Gardina v. Bayview Residential Capital LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00896
Defendant:
Mr. Cooper Group, Bayview Residential Capital LLC, Blue Water Capital LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Steven Gardina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Fraud
Halpren v. Carvin Wilson Software LLC
as 2:2023cv00845
Plaintiff:
Michael Halpren
Defendant:
Carvin Wilson Software LLC doing business as Carvin Software
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Caddo Systems Incorporated et al v. Progress Software Corporation
as 2:2023mc00019
Plaintiff:
Caddo Systems Incorporated and 511 Technologies Incorporated
Defendant:
Progress Software Corporation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
