US District Court for the Eastern District of California Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 44,437
(PC) Harper v. Williams et al
as 2:2024cv01156
Plaintiff:
Daniel Harper
Defendant:
Clayborne Williams and Jeff Lynch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Harper v. Powell, et al.
as 1:2024cv00456
Plaintiff:
Daniel Harper
Defendant:
B Powell, S. Arana, J Grove and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Madero v. The People
as 1:2024cv00445
Petitioner:
Eric Cruz Madero
Respondent:
The People
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Flores v. The People
as 1:2024cv00444
Petitioner:
Joaquin Flores
Respondent:
The People
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Pink v. Schuyler
as 1:2024cv00449
Petitioner:
Dvontae Larome Pink
Respondent:
Charles Schuyler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Howard v. Rios et al
as 1:2024cv00447
Plaintiff:
Karlis Ruben Augustus Howard
Defendant:
J. Rios, Steve Smith, City of Coalinga and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Bonilla v. People of the State of California
as 2:2024cv01120
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla, VEXATIOUS LITIGANT
Defendant:
People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Distin v. US Army et al
as 2:2024cv01121
Plaintiff:
Phillip Christopher Distin
Defendant:
US Army and CDC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Rocha v. Monroe, et al.
as 1:2024cv00446
Plaintiff:
Randy Joe Rocha
Defendant:
Atlee M Monroe, James Fontento, M Kieu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Bonilla v. People of the State of California
as 2:2024cv01126
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla, VEXATIOUS LITIGANT
Defendant:
People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
