US District Court for the Northern District of California Torts - Property Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 3,033
RA CAPITAL HEALTHCARE FUND, L.P. v. ChemoCentryx, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv02645
Plaintiff:
RA CAPITAL HEALTHCARE FUND, L.P.
Defendant:
ChemoCentryx, Inc. and Thomas J. Schall
Coulter v. Dropbox, Inc.
as 4:2024cv02637
Plaintiff:
Ramsey Coulter
Defendant:
Dropbox, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Ryan v. Mr. Bar-B-Q Products LLC
as 5:2024cv02605
Plaintiff:
Darren Ryan
Defendant:
Mr. Bar-B-Q Products LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Fullove v. Fullove
as 3:2024cv02616
Plaintiff:
Marianne Fullove
Defendant:
Shaluinn Fullove
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Maketa v. Target Corporation et al
as 4:2024cv02576
Plaintiff:
Dassah Maketa
Defendant:
Target Corporation and Target Brands, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
County of Oakland, Michigan v. Meta Platforms Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv02554
Plaintiff:
County of Oakland, Michigan
Defendant:
Meta Platforms Inc., Instagram, LLC, Facebook Payments, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Smith, Jr. v. General Motors, LLC et al
as 5:2024cv02540
Plaintiff:
Donald Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC, OnStar, LLC and LexisNexis Risk Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Olteanu v. Gonzales et al
as 4:2024cv02347
Plaintiff:
Andreea Melissa Olteanu
Defendant:
Eric Gonzales, Anca Olteanu, Louis Schneider and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Pachoud v. Surfshark Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv02299
Plaintiff:
Emily Pachoud
Defendant:
Surfshark Inc. and Surfshark B.V.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Squeo v. Campbell Soup Company
as 5:2024cv02235
Plaintiff:
Joe Squeo
Defendant:
Campbell Soup Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
