Connecticut Prisoner Petitions Cases

General Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 101 - 110 of 1,409
OBrien-Veader v. Ramia
as 3:2023cv00414
Petitioner: Matthew OBrien-Veader
Respondent: Marc G Ramia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Harmon
as 3:2023cv00397
Petitioner: Kenneth Brown
Respondent: Harmon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cogdell v. Warden
as 3:2023cv00387
Petitioner: Andre Cogdell and Andre D. Cogdell
Respondent: Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Grullon-Rodriguez v. Nash et al
as 3:2023cv00346
Petitioner: Walkiria Grullon-Rodriguez
Respondent: Nash and Stover
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Patel v. Warden et al
as 3:2023cv00347
Plaintiff: Firoz Patel
Defendant: Warden and Attorney General of the United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Churuk v. Ramos We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv00213
Petitioner: Yarslov Churuk
Respondent: R Ramos and R. Ramos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Parker v. Nash We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv00183
Petitioner: Darren Parker
Respondent: Nash
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Self v. Pullen
as 3:2023cv00181
Petitioner: Darrell Self
Respondent: T. Pullen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Alkafi v. Pullen
as 3:2023cv00187
Petitioner: Kasan Alkafi
Respondent: Timethea Pullen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Milchin v. Nash
as 3:2023cv00162
Petitioner: Michael Milchin
Respondent: Nash
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?