US District Court for the District of Columbia
Cases 1 - 10 of 59,261
MERCHIA v. HARVARD PILGRIM HEALTHCARE, INC.
as 1:2023cv03913
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
LABRADOR v. NTV INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION et al
as 1:2024cv03541
Defendant:
NTV INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION and SHO WATANABE
Plaintiff:
LEILA MARCELIN LABRADOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (
JARAKI et al v. SYRIAN ARAB REPUBLIC
as 1:2024cv03534
Plaintiff:
HALLA JARAKI and OMAR JARAKI
Defendant:
SYRIAN ARAB REPUBLIC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act
POPE et al v. YAZAM INC.
as 1:2024cv03540
Defendant:
YAZAM INC. d/b/a EMPOWER
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL POPE, SARAH ABEL and JORDYNN GOINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
SZTROM et al v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
as 1:2024cv03548
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SZTROM and DAVID SZTROM
Defendant:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03550
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03533
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03543
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Judicial Review of Agency Decision
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03544
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03549
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.