US District Court for the District of Columbia Civil Rights Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 4,917
DAVIS v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2024cv00703
Plaintiff:
CRYSTAL DAVIS
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, EMMANUEL AGBARA, INNOCENT OPARA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ANDERSON v. VILSACK
as 1:2024cv00736
Plaintiff:
RONALD W. ANDERSON
Defendant:
THOMAS J. VILSACK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MARSH v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2024cv00683
Plaintiff:
Anthony Marsh II
Not Yet Classified:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Defendant:
Anthony Delborrell and JOHN BEWLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
PAGE v. EVANS
as 1:2024cv00670
Plaintiff:
JOHN H. PAGE
Defendant:
MONICA H. EVANS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
EDWARDS v. CHARLES SCHWAB CORPORATION et al
as 1:2024cv00666
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN S. EDWARDS
Defendant:
CHARLES SCHWAB CORPORATION, EMMET G. SULLIVAN, PHH MORTGAGE ET AL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
ROLLINS v. OTTMAN
as 1:2024cv00605
Plaintiff:
LAKEISHA ROLLINS
Defendant:
JULIE OTTMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ROLLINS v. MONTGOMERY
as 1:2024cv00606
Plaintiff:
LAKEISHA BOLLINS and LAKEISHA ROLLINS
Defendant:
STEPHEN MONTGOMERY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
ISOM v. NELSON
as 1:2024cv00648
Plaintiff:
TYESHA ISOM
Defendant:
JANE NELSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
SOOS v. MCDONOUGH et al
as 1:2024cv00196
Plaintiff:
EMERY SOOS
Defendant:
DENIS R. MCDONOUGH and WALT C. DANNENBERG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HURT v. VOL. CONSTITUTION 1608-1775 et al
as 1:2024cv00649
Plaintiff:
TYRONE HURT
Defendant:
VOL. CONSTITUTION 1608-1775, NATIONAL MUSUEM OF AFRICAN AMERICAN HISTORY AND CULTURE and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
