US District Court for the Southern District of Florida Civil Rights Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 31,017
Hayden v. Viking Arms Condominium Association, Inc.
as 9:2024cv80523
Plaintiff:
Thomas Hayden
Defendant:
Viking Arms Condominium Association, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Alexander v. F.S.R. TRUCKING, INC.
as 9:2024cv80518
Plaintiff:
Juan Alexander
Defendant:
F.S.R. TRUCKING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21599
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv14126
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794 Job Discrimination (Handicap)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21583
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21588
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Caplan v. Vic's Automotive & A/C Inc. et al
as 0:2024cv60677
Plaintiff:
Howard Michael Caplan
Defendant:
Vic's Automotive & A/C Inc. and MKZ Davie Commerce 2, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2024cv80507
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Smith v. Dimitri et al
as 1:2024cv21574
Plaintiff:
Samuel Lee Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
Jason Dimitri and MDC Childrens Courthouse
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21571
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
